超現實主義在二十世紀現代繪畫中的表現風格--無理性的拼貼
Rene Magritte, "Rape"
(Le viol)
(1935), oil on canvas, 25x18 cm, private collection
「強暴」("Rape" )這幅畫中， 馬格利特強烈地 批判人們視覺的 習慣性與 隱藏其中的 強暴慾望。 畫面上是一個女子的頭部，但是這個女子的 面孔五官 卻被置換為 裸露的女體與性器： 她的雙目被乳房取代， 她的鼻子成為肚癠眼， 而她的嘴吧 更被覆蓋著陰毛的 下體遮蓋。
這個女子不能觀看， 不能言語， 甚至不能呼吸。 女子自然的容貌不再存在， 取代的是人們慾望的焦點，而且是 已不經女性同意 許可而強行植入的 方式取代。
人們慾望的 強暴本質在此 展露無遺。
劉紀蕙
【發表個人意見】
【閱讀他人意見】
請輸入對這幅畫的個人想法、意見
請在畫名後加註日期，再輸入資料
Magritte, "Rape"
您的單位、姓名、學號：
【GO BACK】
閱 讀 論 壇
name: 英文系三，高維泓，483200039 comment: Magritte, "Rape" 我個人認為其實這只是一個被畫做像女子頭部的“物體“，簡單 來說它就是典型男性沙豬極（急）欲看到或感官到的某些物質的 組合體，它不是“女人“也沒有“女人“長這樣，它充其量者是 男性viewer的心理投射品，畫家明知而仍用這樣的方式表達，其 諷刺意含多麼不言而寓了。 如果我們只是繞著這“女子“如何被 醜化來討論，我想我們就中了 Magritte的計了，因為這是“男人 “內心的殘缺，與女人無關。畫家畫的是一個男人，而非女人。 name: Ph. junior and Eg. double major Deniz 483032339 comment: Magritte, "Rape" 4/27 1997 這幅沒有喉結的面孔顯然是一位女性: 這幅畫只提出兩個問題: 1 你/妳是這樣看人嗎? 2 妳 是這樣呈現自己給人看的嗎? name: Junior June 483200704 comment: Magritte, "Rape" This painting is more appropriate to be entitled as "ravishness of men." It's not simply relating to the sexual organs of woman but it's more on what men see on women. name: 輔大比研所 Rhonda 484278045 comment: Magritte, "Rape" March 6, 1997 每日我們睜開雙眼，站在浴室盥洗台前，望向鏡中，看見的是 甚麼？有哪些是昨夜留下待洗的污穢？每個小孩都必須學習洗臉、 刷牙、梳頭、更衣、、「清洗」成為生活中最「不」精神但最必 須的儀式。在畫中我看到憶一種無法擦拭的焦慮。在所謂置換、 錯置的手法中，我再也無法以為一切就緒，可以整裝出發。 不!我無法開口，哽塞在我喉中使我無法「發聲」的東西， 可是Lacan那代表權力的象徵物？這鉗制我的「權力」，對我而言 卻是暴力。我的臉在「你」的凝視下，成為你欲望的對象物， 如此裸露而脆弱。在這片無情的荒原中，我的憤怒從喉部蔓延至 全「身」，而終如火燄般燃放在我散亂的髮稍、飄向天際。 name: English, Junior, Karen Huang,483200376 comment: Magritte, "Rape" 1997.3.4 I think the painter again wanted to challenge the impression that has long occupied in our mind. The painting suffocates me, when I try to look at it. I feel I can't breathe anymore for there is no way or no room for me to breathe. Furthermore, the painting also shows the idea that women are always oppressed in the society. Being a woman, she has very little chance to express her feelings or ideas. A woman always has to be quiet and voiceless. I do believe the way the society or to say the men tries to prison women's freedom of thinkin and movement is actually a kind of rape. name: 英文三 梁啟真 483200417 comment: Magritte, "Rape" 乍看之下,覺得這女人的臉怎麼怪怪的,原來作者把女人的 性器官搬到女人的臉上來了,顯現女人的性器官比女人的 臉更重要,暗示女人對男人的性暴力作了一種無言的抗議 name: 英文系 盧柏仲 483200388 comment: Magritte, "Rape" 3月五日 我想,這幅畫很明顯地表達人們借由視覺來渲洩內心所 壓抑的強暴慾望,也就是所為的視覺強暴 name: 英文系 盧柏仲 483200388 comment: Magritte, "Rape" 3月五日 由這幅畫,我們可以明顯感受到隱藏在人們內心的強暴 慾望,經常透過視覺的注視來達到渲洩慾望的效果.不論你 身上穿著多少衣物,在人們眼中,你都是全裸.然而視覺強暴 的發生與否,通常又決定女人的臉孔.我想這大概是作者用 女性生殖器及乳房來取代眼及口的原因. 將人們眼中的女性用單純的生殖功能來表現. name: Senior, Jean Ding, 482200812 comment: Magritte, "Rape" March 20,1997 This picture reminds me of a term "visual rape." Someone told me that some men would rape women by their visual sense. That is, they would "imagine" to rape the women standing near them. In fact, women are men's raping object, no matter by actual action or by imagination. I think this picture just reflects men's inner and secret desire to rape women, though the men are gentle in their real life. name: Tracy Lin 483200132 英文三 comment: Magritte, "Rape" When I first saw this painting, I was so surprised to find that a " painting "-- could be given to so many meaningful meanings. It was true that we woman were usually regarded as the tools which just could make men's sexual desire be satisfied. And I totally believed that from some " male animal's l'" point of view, we women were looked like the shape whcih the painting draw above-- we had no face, we had no facial expression and of course, we had only sexual organs. Watching this painting, I didn't know why, but I really thought of the poor woman,彭婉如, who was the victim by " male animals's " sexual desire. Maybe, from that murderer's eyes, 彭婉如was the woman in Rene's painting. name: English Dept/Junior/Rebecca Chan/483200687 comment: Magritte, "Rape" 07/03/1997 當一個女性被強暴以後, 她心靈上的傷害比身體的 創傷來 得嚴重,這個夢魘在她的腦海可能永永遠遠不 會磨滅.
【GO BACK】
超現實主義在二十世紀現代繪畫中的表現風格
