議 題

---

查拉說， 莊子就是達達主義， 你認為呢？

---

【發表個人意見】

【閱讀他人意見】

請輸入對這幅畫的個人想法、意見
請在畫名後加註日期，再輸入資料

莊子就是達達？

您的單位、姓名、學號：

【GO BACK】


閱 讀 網 路 議 題

name: Janet Tung/ 483200584 comment: 莊子就是達達？ Yes, I think the basic thinking of Chuang-Tzu and DaDa is similar. According to Zara, DaDa is a sort of indifference toward all things. Besides, DaDa is everything. This somehow resemble the idea of Chuang -tzu. There is not too much difference between the life of butterfly, and the life of human being. Human can be anything in mind according to their will and imagination. They don't have to be only in the form of "HUMAN BEING"! Thus, there is no specific division to identify the butterfly and the human being. And so, there is no division between life and death. Death is something inevitable. The only difference is only the expiration. The meaning of life and death is only given by the living people. Chuang-tzu foresaw this idea and was indifferent to his wife's death in react. This is somewhat like the indifference of DaDa. name: Ph.junior Deniz 483032339 comment: 莊子就是達達？ 為什麼說莊子是達達?莊子的追求達達嗎?莊子的表現 達達嗎?莊子不認識達達,但達達認同莊子..查拉,你是看到 北溟的鯤,南冥的鵬,夢中的蝶,池畔鬥嘴的惠與莊,還是一 個妻喪鼓盆而歌的男人?還是一個不畏貧窮,諧謔天地人生, 又不放棄內在莊嚴高蹈的人?你和他一在東來一在西,一在 古來一在今,你在劇場顛覆是非實像,他於泥肆中尋求超越 逍遙;形式,內容各有所是,唯那在亂世中夾纏的理想之舞, 與時世,"他們"不唱同調的主題是你們共有的.不過你 認識惠施,鄧析嗎?他們說"卵有毛""雞三足",那他們達達嗎? name: English Department /Junior/Karen Huang/483200376 comment: 莊子就是達達？ 3.24.1997 I think in some aspect 莊子is very like Da Da for they both suggest that nothing is everything and everything is nothing. People tend to have a kind of habit that when they try to do something, they want to have a result. We are always doing something for something else. However, maybe there isn't something behind everything. We don't have to search for the truth because truth is already there. So, we often find that we are lost in the process of searching. Furthermore, I think the most important idea is that we have to relieve our souls and set them free thus we can be more creative. In this way, our imagination would not be restraint anymore and we can express ourselves truely. name: 英文三, 高維泓, 483200039 comment: 莊子就是達達？ March 17, 1997 我想如果要說莊子就是達達,達達就等於莊子. 就好比說草都是綠的,綠色的東西都是草一樣有點 滑稽.但既然這是一個問句,那我就依我對老莊思想 淺薄的了解,勉為試答.我讀查拉的"Eighth Symphony," 不敢說完全懂他想講的,但有點覺得在他眼中DADA 不只是一種藝術的表現方式,而是一種"多面性"的人 生哲學.它可以是"self-contained,"也可以是"self-defeating." 它可以用充滿"DADA"意識的眼光看待我們生存的這個 世界.將所看到的用非常DADA的方式解釋,但也容許非 DADA的詮釋方式.我認為這與老莊所提示"道"的特質 很相似.道無所不在,或存自然,或存人心,是意識的,也 可能被涵括在我們心中,端看習"道"者如何巧妙運用. 查拉也說"DADA,WHICH DIED EVEN BEFORE OT WAS BORN..."這也相應"道"的特質,無所不在且穿 越時空.查拉也說每個人,即便植物都可以做DADA. --"The Gyoto monks are DADA! Beggars who scoff at Yuppies are DADA! The potted plants ....are DADA! Wet fish and dry land are DADA!..." 這跟老莊說"道"存在萬物萬事的想法很接近.但 查拉唯獨說"Politicians are NOT DADA no matter how hard they try."據我所知,老子也認為政治有其 必要性,但必須小國寡民及清靜無為.也許老莊的 理想太高了.但從這一點即可看出查拉所理解的 老莊,我想有點不同於老子或莊子本人吧. DADA,我認為還是一門還很新的藝術或哲學流派, 尚待接受歷史考驗.而究竟查拉本人有沒有真正了 解道家哲學,我想這個問題只有真正完全領會兩造 才有辦法解答.依我研讀老莊的一點心得看來,實 在有很多歧異不能以說"凡綠色都是草"就帶過的.

【GO BACK】